<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.0.0 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:24:30 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/"><rss:title>Nick Redfern's On Something</rss:title><rss:link>http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/</rss:link><rss:description></rss:description><dc:language>en-US</dc:language><dc:date>2008-08-20T21:24:30Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v5.0.0 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/8/7/the-weird-weekend.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/8/6/reviewing-monsters.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/8/2/ufos-monsters-on-coast-to-coast.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/30/mj12-ufos-the-latest.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/29/ufos-at-tujunga-theyre-back.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/23/an-alien-whos-who.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/23/bodies.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/21/vallee-on-binnall-of-america.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/19/ancient-sites-sacred-landscapes.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/14/marie-jones-2012-endings-beginnings.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/8/7/the-weird-weekend.html"><rss:title>THE WEIRD WEEKEND</rss:title><rss:link>http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/8/7/the-weird-weekend.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Culture of Contact</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-08-07T19:24:16Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<br><p><span class="full-image-block"><span><img  src="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/storage/logo.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1218137148246"></span></span>
This is a reminder to anyone and everyone who might<br>
want to attend, that on the weekend of 15 to 17<br>
August, the Center for Fortean Zoology will be holding<br>
its annual Weird Weekend conference in the village of<br>
Woolfardisworthy, Devon, England.<br>
<br>
For those who want to attend, here's the WW website<br>
link where you'll find everything you'll need about<br>
the lectures, the speakers, the timetable,<br>
accommodation in the area and much more:<br>
<br>
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.cfz.org.uk/conferences/weirdweekend/ww2007/ww07index.htm">http://www.cfz.org.uk/conferences/weirdweekend/ww2007/ww07index.htm</a><br>
<br>
Having spoken at 4 of the last 8 WW's, I can tell you<br>
that it's an excellent event, with a wide and varied<br>
array of speakers on a whole range of topics. You'll<br>
get to hear much on cryptozoology and strange<br>
creatures, and just about anything and everything of a<br>
Fortean nature.<br>
<br>
Speakers at this year's event include Dr. Karl Shuker,<br>
Richard Freeman, Matthew Williams, Ronan Coghlan, Dr.<br>
Gail-Nina Anderson, Mike Hallowell, Chris Moiser, Tim<br>
Matthews, Paul Vella, Lee Walker, Geoff Ward, Matt<br>
Salusbury, Dr. Mike Dash, Oll Lewis and Michael<br>
Woodley.
</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/8/6/reviewing-monsters.html"><rss:title>Reviewing Monsters</rss:title><rss:link>http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/8/6/reviewing-monsters.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Nick Redfern</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-08-06T12:13:50Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<span class=blsp-spelling-error id=SPELLING_ERROR_0>Kithra</span> has just <span class=blsp-spelling-corrected id=SPELLING_ERROR_1>written</span> a review of my new book, <EM>There's Something in the Woods</EM>, and which can be found both <A href="http://kithraskrystalkave.blogspot.com/2008/08/theres-something-in-woods.html"><STRONG><font color=#800040>here</font></STRONG></A> and <A href="http://womenesoterica.blogspot.com/2008/08/theres-something-in-woods.html"><STRONG><font color=#800040>here</font></STRONG></A>.]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/8/2/ufos-monsters-on-coast-to-coast.html"><rss:title>UFOs &amp; Monsters on Coast to Coast</rss:title><rss:link>http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/8/2/ufos-monsters-on-coast-to-coast.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Nick Redfern</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-08-02T17:03:54Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>For those who may be interested, I’ll be on <EM>Coast to Coast</EM> on Sunday night through the early hours of Monday morning talking about my new book, <EM>There’s Something in the Woods</EM>.</P>
<P>The times are 11PM to 2AM West Coast Time; 1AM to 4AM Central Time; and 2AM to 5AM East Coast Time. The information on the show at the Coast to Coast website can be found <A href="http://www.coasttocoastam.com/shows/2008/08/03.html"><font color=#800080>here</font></A> and <A href="http://www.coasttocoastam.com/guests/691.html"><font color=#800080>here</font></A>.</P>
<P>Although much of the discussion will be on cryptozoology (such as reports of Bigfoot in both the UK and the United States; the werewolves of Britain and Texas; lake-monsters; giant winged-things such as Mothman and the Thunderbirds; ghostly black dogs; and big-cats on the loose), the book also delves into such issues as the Aztec, New Mexico UFO crash story of 1948; an alleged UFO crash in Texas in 1964; and Crop Circles.</P>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/30/mj12-ufos-the-latest.html"><rss:title>MJ12 &amp; UFOs: The Latest</rss:title><rss:link>http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/30/mj12-ufos-the-latest.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Nick Redfern</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-07-30T22:49:14Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>The father-son team of Dr. Robert Wood and Ryan Wood reveal their latest findings on the MJ12 documents:</P>
<P><EM>The Majestic Documents Newsletter </EM></P>
<P><EM>In This Issue</EM></P>
<P><EM>Leaked Orginal Documents Reveal Extensive UFO Security Concerns<br>July 2008 </EM></P>
<P>“Forensic testing equivalent to what a judge could order in a court case indicates that these two documents have paper, ink, watermark, handwriting and other indications consistent with their claimed dates and contents,” reported Dr. Wood.</P>
<P>“We stand on the shoulders of earlier scientists with the courage and credentials to address this issue with integrity,” noted Wood. “Men like the late NASA scientist Dr. Paul Hill, the late<br>atmospheric physicist Dr. James McDonald, and the former Air Force consultant Dr. J. Allen Hynek who came to believe so-called Project Blue Book led the public astray.”</P>
<P>“The attachments describe extreme security measures,” he noted, “including authorization to ‘detain and interrogate any and all targets.’ It cites biological warfare, or contamination concerns, to be met by ‘HOUSE CLEANING operations in major population centers,’ along with potential use of MK-ULTRA and ARTICHOKE, notorious human control projects that surfaced in Church Committee hearings about the CIA before the Senate in 1975.”</P>
<P>Greetings! </P>
<P>FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE</P>
<P>July 26, 2008, Boulder, CO - At least two documents from a large trove of leaked UFO materials have appeared in original ink and paper with contents showing extensive official security concerns about Unidentified Flying Objects (UFO), according to Dr. Robert M. Wood speaking during and after the annual meeting of the Society for Scientific Exploration (SSE).</P>
<P>“Forensic testing equivalent to what a judge could order in a court case indicates that these two documents have paper, ink, watermark, handwriting and other indications consistent with their claimed dates and contents,” reported Dr. Wood. The tests were conducted by Speckin Forensic Labratories.</P>
<P>Wood, a retired aerospace physicist with 43 years as a research executive at McDonnell Douglas Corporation, joins acclaimed astronaut Dr. Edgar Mitchell, physicist Dr. Peter Sturrock of Stanford University and other respected scientists who have called for serious public study of UFOs despite chronic official denials of their importance.</P>
<P>“We stand on the shoulders of earlier scientists with the courage and credentials to address this issue,” noted Wood. “Men like the late NASA scientist Dr. Paul Hill, the late atmospheric physicist Dr. James McDonald, and the former Air Force consultant Dr. J. Allen Hynek who came to believe so-called Project Blue Book led the public astray.”</P>
<P>Speaking at the Society’s annual meeting in Boulder, CO, to an audience whose principal members possess doctoral degrees, Wood discussed in detail the “Bowen manuscript,” an authentic draft of a book entitled “An Encyclopedia of Flying Saucers,” which the author Vernon Bowen submitted to the Air Force for pre-publication review.</P>
<P>According to handwritten annotations on the manuscript, it was “submitted to Project Blue Book in 1961″ and subsequently passed to those who stamped some pages in red ink - tested to be of appropriate age and kind - with the classification “TOP SECRET/MAJIC” and “FOR US ‘EYES ONLY’.”</P>
<P>“Bowen’s extensive public research may have put the pieces of the jigsaw together and come too close for comfort,” said Dr. Wood. “The draft manuscript never did find its way to publication but was leaked to researchers among other UFO documents in 1999. Those who leaked these materials clearly had access to a document that had been in custody of an admitted Air Force UFO project.”</P>
<P>Dr. Wood discussed a second document - known as the “burned memo” - delivered in the original and now subjected to forensic testing without public fanfare in order to ensure careful analysis.</P>
<P>“Forensic dating and analysis of paper, ink, watermarks, annotations and other details all comport with the source’s statement that this document was one of the those meant to be burned from the private safe of CIA counterintelligence director James Jesus Angleton, who died in 1987, but snatched from destruction at the last minute,” stated Wood.</P>
<P>“This remarkable document with scorch marks on paper of the period is stamped in red ink with the classification ‘TOP SECRET/MJ-12,’ ” said Wood. “It is a carbon draft from the Director of Central Intelligence referred to as ‘MJ-1.’ The memo and its attachments, whose paper and ink have been validated by forensic testing, lay out extreme concern to keep UFO matters even from President Kennedy, referred to as ‘Lancer,’ his then-classified Secret Service codename.”</P>
<P>Attachments to the memo discuss keeping UFO data largely outside normal defense channels; using the Air Force’s admitted Blue Book UFO project for counterintelligence; and purging files prior to responding to freedom of information requests, a well known concept even before the Freedom of Information Act was passed a few years later.</P>
<P>“We know this original document was leaked from a source who mailed it along with a cover note and copies of other UFO files in an envelope stamped with a postage meter traced to CIA Headquarters,” stated Wood.</P>
<P>“The attachments describe extreme security measures,” he noted, “including authorization to ‘detain and interrogate any and all targets.’ It cites biological warfare, or contamination concerns, to be met by ‘HOUSE CLEANING operations in major population centers,’ along with potential use of MK-ULTRA and ARTICHOKE, notorious human control projects that surfaced in Church Committee hearings about the CIA before the Senate in 1975.”</P>
<P>Perhaps most intriguing, Wood reported, is the final attachment. It states that if “Washington” is “non-conducive” to these activities and “cannot be influenced any further” (would this mean ‘Lancer,’ mentioned earlier, or other uncooperative officials?), the environment should be made “wet.” Unknown until years later - except to intelligence insiders - “wet affairs” was intelligence jargon for assassination.</P>
<P>“It will be extremely difficult or perhaps impossible to find archival files to corroborate this memo fully,” said Wood. “By the source’s own account, it was uniquely snatched from destruction at the last moment. But forensic tests validate the physical document. There are little-known citations in the content that we have verified by research. And, again, our investigations reveal documents were mailed from CIA Headquarters.”</P>
<P>“It is certainly possible someone with access to CIA Headquarters has the counterfeiting expertise to forge documents with decades-old paper, ink and authentic watermarks; make complex, insider references to classified activities; and also possess a manuscript submitted to the Air Force’s former UFO project.”</P>
<P>“It is also possible these documents - not copies but originals - pose very serious questions about how far some would go to hide UFO information,” said Wood. “Citizens deserve to know where these documents came from, who produced them or marked them classified, and why.”</P>
<P>The “Bowen manuscript” in part and the entire “burned memo” are available online at the web address: www.majesticdocuments.com. High-resolution scans of the “burned memo” are available to researchers. </P>
<P>A recording of Dr. Wood’s formal presentation can be obtained from the Society for Scientific Exploration<br>www.scientificexploration.org </P>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/29/ufos-at-tujunga-theyre-back.html"><rss:title>UFOs at Tujunga - They're Back!</rss:title><rss:link>http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/29/ufos-at-tujunga-theyre-back.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Nick Redfern</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-07-29T21:20:19Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<P><A href="http://www.ufomystic.com/wp-content/uploads/tujunga.jpg"><img  class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-1417" title=tujunga height=300 alt="" src="http://www.ufomystic.com/wp-content/uploads/tujunga-187x300.jpg" width=187></A></P>
<P>Just re-published by <A href="http://www.anomalistbooks.com/"><font color=#800080>Anomalist Books</font></A>:</P>
<P><em><A href="http://www.anomalistbooks.com/druffel-rogo.html"><font color=#800080>The Tujunga Canyon Contacts</font></em><font color=#800080> by Ann Druffel and the late D. Scott Rogo.</font></A></P>
<P>This is a classic book, about which the publisher says:</P>
<P>“<em>THE TUJUNGA CANYON CONTACTS </em>tells the true stories of five young women ‘abductees’ who lived in and near Tujunga Canyon, northeast of Los Angeles, and who were all linked by more or less intimate personal relationships. The abductions and related events, which took place over a period of more than two decades, were first investigated by UFO researcher Ann Druffel for five full years, and later by Druffel and parapsychologist D. Scott Rogo together. Many of the abduction details first revealed in the Tujunga Canyon case have been confirmed in the hundreds of cases that followed it. </P>
<P>“First published during the peak of the 20th century’s UFO abduction epidemic, <em>THE TUJUNGA CANYON CONTACTS</em> was only the second book written about so-called ‘alien abductions.’ This edition of the classic work contains the two new chapters prepared for the updated version of the book. During this updating of the story, Druffel first realized that abduction scenarios can be fended off by strongwilled, confident experiencers, since three of the five young women intuitively discovered, and used, various ‘resistance techniques’ to fend off, and eventually end, the harrowing attacks.”</P>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/23/an-alien-whos-who.html"><rss:title>An Alien Who's Who</rss:title><rss:link>http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/23/an-alien-whos-who.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Nick Redfern</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-07-23T21:09:31Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>&nbsp;<img  alt=[aww-med.jpg] src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_pXl03njloLM/SCofPS8mZVI/AAAAAAAAAi4/wSbQckCgJbA/s1600/aww-med.jpg" border=0><span class=></span>&nbsp;</P>
<DIV class="main section" id=main>
<DIV class="widget Blog" id=Blog1>
<DIV class="blog-posts hfeed">The following review by me of <A title="An Alien Who's Who" href="http://www.amazon.com/ALIEN-WHOS-WHO-Martin-Kottmeyer/dp/1933665246/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&amp;s=books&amp;qid=1209591032&amp;sr=1-1"><EM><font color=#081ade>An Alien Who’s Who</font></EM></A> (edited by Martin S. Kottmeyer, and published by Anomalist Books) was published in issue 2 of Stuart Miller’s excellent <A title="Alien Worlds" href="http://www.alienworldsmag.com/"><EM><font color=#081ade>Alien Worlds</font></EM></A> magazine, and is reproduced with Stuart’s permission:<br><br>Depending on your own personal perspective regarding what lies at the heart of the UFO puzzle, <EM>An Alien Who’s Who</EM> reveals a great deal about (a) the dizzying variety of extraterrestrials that have visited the Earth for a good many years; (b) the tall-tales of a whole range of fantasists and con-merchants; or (c) the way in which the UFO phenomenon, and those within it, are constantly being manipulated and exploited by a true trickster of a type that would make both John Keel and Jacques Vallee very proud.<br><br>Or, maybe it’s all three theories, or perhaps none of them. Whatever the case, I know only this much for certain: Martin Kottmeyer’s book is damned good fun and highly informative – and in equal measures, too.<br><br>Basically, it’s a 263-page, A to Z-style page-turner that lists a truly startling number of names attributed to aliens that are said to have visited the Earth. Of course, reading about the trials, tribulations and exploits of hundreds of alleged aliens that range from Acorc (the denizen of an over-crowded planet 52 million kilometers from Earth) to Zyloo (who supposedly ‘followed Apollo 13’ and became involved in the ‘Sixth Patrol Division’, whatever the hell that is or was) could very quickly become tedious.<br><br>In the hands of Kottmeyer, however, tediousness is the last thing that springs to mind. Certainly, most of the entries are relatively brief; however, they are also tinged with a welcome bit of deadpan humour. For example, Herronoah – who hails from the planet Epicot - tells a startled earthling named ‘Edwin W’ that human beings wear too many clothes, and goes on to inform Edwin how, on one occasion, ‘their ship spooked a naked woman and man in a clump of bushes’. Ahem.<br><br>Then we get treated to the spectacle of Aura Rhanes, the hot space-babe from a far-off world called Clarion who, according to Truman Bethurum, the man she appeared before, wore ‘slacks’ that ‘appeared almost as if painted on her, so snugly did they fit’. Lucky Truman, that’s all I can say. And what are we to make of Motag, who ‘once converted a flying saucer into a truck’? Or Nokyle, who intriguingly threatens to reveal details of a certain incident involving what are tantalisingly described only as ‘crazy girls’?<br><br>As you have probably already guessed, many of the entries contained within the packed pages of <EM>An Alien Who’s Who</EM> hail from that much-ridiculed era of the so-called Contactee: those seemingly elite souls who claimed face-to-face encounters with long-haired aliens back in the 1950s and whose names were invariably made up of a lot of Q’s, Z’s and X’s.<br><br>It should be stressed that the ridiculous and often hysterical nature of some of the stories does not undermine Kottmeyer’s credibility as an author. Indeed, he points out in his Introduction that he does not believe in ‘physically real aliens’, from Venus, Mars, Pluto, and so on.<br><br>Rather, for the most part, Kottmeyer has done something that few authors seldom do: he leaves his own views and beliefs at the door, and instead provides the reader with entertaining – and otherwise very hard to find – summaries on alleged other-worldly entities that have supposedly been manifesting before select members of the Human Race for decades.<br><br>Kottmeyer relates their bizarre, unverifiable and at times completely false tales, prophecies and warnings. And, in a roundabout way, he amply demonstrates that for all the attempts to legitimise Ufology as a serious science, it is still a subject that is packed with odd and unusual characters with weird names and even weirder motivations – and if you think I’m just talking about the aliens here, well, you’re very wrong, my friends.<br><br>With an entertaining and insightful Foreword from ufologist and Project Beta author Greg Bishop, <EM>An Alien Who’s Who</EM> is vital reading for anyone and everyone that wants to learn more about some of the strange, other-worldly beings said to have visited our planet and whose exploits, without Kottmeyer, would otherwise be lost to the fog of time.<br><br>And, with all that now said, I’m off to meet Solar-Commander Xzzobovaxxx for a spot of dinner, followed by a flight around Venus with the bikini-clad Amazonians of Delta-Zorvog 12. Wish me luck!<br><br>For more details, see <A href="http://www.anomalistbooks.com/"><font color=#081ade>http://www.anomalistbooks.com/</font></A> </DIV></DIV></DIV>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/23/bodies.html"><rss:title>Bodies!</rss:title><rss:link>http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/23/bodies.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Nick Redfern</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-07-23T20:44:21Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[In my book <EM>Body Snatchers in the Desert</EM> I made a passing reference to a story concerning the alleged transfer to Los <span class=blsp-spelling-error id=SPELLING_ERROR_0>Alamos</span>, New Mexico (between 1945 and 1947) of what were rumored to be a number of refrigerated Japanese cadavers used in secret experimentation. Outrageous? Some thought so; <A href="http://www.universetoday.com/2008/07/21/nasas-use-of-cadavers-to-test-the-orion-capsule/"><font color=#cc0000>but now there's this...</font></A>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/21/vallee-on-binnall-of-america.html"><rss:title>Vallee on "Binnall of America"</rss:title><rss:link>http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/21/vallee-on-binnall-of-america.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Nick Redfern</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-07-21T21:51:46Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<P>DON"T MISS THIS! </P>
<P>On the latest episode of Binnall of America Tim Binnall interviews Jacques Vallee. Here's Tim to tell us more:</P>
<P><A href="http://www.binnallofamerica.com/boaa7.20.8.html">Jacques Vallee, <EM>Messengers of Deception &amp; The Alien Contact Trilogy</EM>, 1 Hour, 54 Minutes</A> </P>
<P>An episode nine months in the making, it’s the season finale of BoA:Audio, Season III featuring an icon in the world of esoterica, the legendary Jacques Vallee. In this nearly two-hour conversation, we’ll be covering a plethora of topics related to Vallee’s groundbreaking research. Among the topics discussed: the impetus for the “Vallee renaissance” of the last year, an in-depth examination of the problems with the ETH theory of UFOs, Vallee on contemporary Ufology &amp; the media, and how UFO studies have changed over the last 20 years. </P>
<P>Additionally, we’ll have a thorough look at a number of highlights and themes found in <EM><STRONG>Messengers of Deception</STRONG></EM> and the Alien Contact Trilogy (<EM><STRONG>Dimensions</STRONG></EM>, <EM><STRONG>Confrontations</STRONG></EM>, and <EM><STRONG>Revelations</STRONG></EM>) including Vallee’s prescient research on UFO cults, why proving UFOs are real is no longer relevant since the public already believes they exist, use of scientific equipment on UFO investigations, the “six social effects caused by belief in UFOs,” specialization in Ufology and why Jacques thinks that has changed for the better, the French close encounter wave of the 1950’s, and classic scholars whose work mirrored contemporary Ufology. </P>
<P>We’ll also find out what Jacques meant by his famous quote “I’m certain that UFOs are reality, but I’ll be disappointed if they turn out to be only spacecraft from outer space,” Occam’s Razor and UFOs, sincerity of witnesses, the paradox of UFOs breaking the perceived “non-involvement” policy that many in Ufology claim they adhere to, cattle mutilations, the nature of government UFO documents, and Ufologists driven by the need for vindication. </P>
<P>And, as always, tons and tons more. </P>
<P>*** </P>
<P>Full Preview: We kick things off by finding out the impetus for the “Vallee renaissance” of this past year, which has seen Jacques return to the public eye with the republication of four of his classic books. He discusses the Alien Contact Trilogy and talks about which book from the trilogy was most popular and which was least popular and why that is “somewhat disheartening” to him. He also talks about what his goals were for the books. </P>
<P>Next, we discuss Vallee’s argument against the Extraterrestrial Hypothesis (ETH) as the source of UFOs. He clarifies his take on the ETH and explains why he put forward an alternative theory to the ETH in the first place. He details how his perspective changed with regards to the source of UFOs and goes on to lay out some of the key issues that are unanswered by the present ETH model. Some of these paradoxes discussed by Jacques include unanswered questions about the timeline of UFO sightings throughout human history, the unlikely biological similarities between humans and purported ETs, and the problem with the illogically high number of close encounters. He also details his issues with the “genetic study of humans” theory behind abductions. </P>
<P>We get Vallee’s perspective on contemporary Ufology and how he feels about where the field has gone in the last 20 years, since the publication of his recently re-released books. He reflects on the pros and cons of the rise of the Internet, talks about the “tyranny of polarization” in the media, and discusses how revolutionary multiple dimension theories of UFOs that were once considered too “far out” for Ufology are now a part of serious mainstream physics discussions. This leads to Vallee noting how UFO case studies have changed in the last 20 years. </P>
<P>We talk about another staple of Vallee’s groundbreaking research: his examination of UFO-tinged cults. He reflects on how his early work looking into UFO cults drew controversy from Ufology and goes on to detail the rise of Scientology, the Raelians, and how he warned about the Heaven’s Gate cult long before their infamous mass suicide. Diving into examination of the book <EM><STRONG>Messengers of Deception</STRONG></EM>, we talk about Jacques observation of a UFO hunting group and his statement that “bringing scientific equipment only creates the opportunity for peculiar effects” and we get him to extrapolate on that sentiment. This leads to a brief side discussion on his work with NIDS at the Skinwalker Ranch. </P>
<P>Following that, we discuss one of the running themes of <EM><STRONG>Messengers of Deception</STRONG></EM>: the pronouncement, by Jacques, that it no longer matters if UFOs are real or not, because the public has already accepted that they are. This leads to him talking about the problem of polarization and how it is a longstanding problem of scientific thinking. We then cover his position that perhaps the UFO phenomenon is absurd on purpose in order to dissuade scientific investigation, which segues into him discussing how much of the power of the UFO phenomenon comes from its evasiveness. </P>
<P>We then go over the “six social effects caused by belief in UFOs,” one of the key tenets of <EM><STRONG>Messengers of Deception</STRONG></EM>. Jacques talks first about the effect that UFOs make people believe that the great inventions of mankind could not have been built by humans. Second, he details how belief in UFOs widens the gap between the public and scientific institutions. Thirdly, we cover how “attention to UFO activity promotes the political unification of this planet” and Jacques explains how this could be a good thing, despite the sinister connotations. </P>
<P>Covering the latter half of the six social effects, we discuss how the UFO phenomenon can give rise to a “high demand religion.” Next, we cover the fifth social effect: “Irrational motivations based on faith are spreading hand-in-hand with the belief in extraterrestrial intervention” and Jacques gives a thoughtful explanation on what this social effect is all about. Wrapping up the six social effects, we cover how contactee philosophies promote “higher races” and the elimination of democracy. </P>
<P>We look at Vallee’s observation that UFOs could be used as a stratagem by humans to guide the population and how that observation has been proven correct since he first put it forward in his books. He talks about how the UFO phenomenon has been used by the US and Russian government to cover-up covert activities. </P>
<P>Moving on to talk about the Alien Contact Trilogy, we start with his critique (from the 1st book, <EM><STRONG>Dimensions</STRONG></EM>) that Ufology is too specialized and misses out on the cultural precursors to contemporary UFO and close encounter stories. Jacques explains why he would “make a different assessment now” and goes on to explain how things have changed since he first made that critique in the book. We then talk about one of the key UFO waves that provided a wealth of information found in <EM><STRONG>Dimensions</STRONG></EM>, the French UFO / close encounter wave of the 1950’s and how it had a big effect on Jacques as a teenager. </P>
<P>Looking at another aspect covered in <EM><STRONG>Dimensions</STRONG></EM>, we discuss how seriously and studiously scholars from the past would debate the nature of enigmatic “beings,” much like contemporary Ufology does with close encounter cases. We then talk about his concern that people want UFO disclosure so bad that they don’t question the validity of it or the political motivations that may be behind it. </P>
<P>We move on to <EM><STRONG>Confrontations</STRONG></EM>, the second book in the trilogy, and start with Vallee’s famous statement “I’m certain that UFOs are reality, but I’ll be disappointed if they turn out to be only spacecraft from outer space.” Jacques gives us the background of that often-quoted line, why he said it, what he meant by it, and how it is often misrepresented by others in Ufology. We discuss Vallee’s take on Occam’s Razor and how it cannot be aptly applied to the UFO phenomenon. Following that, we have Jacques extrapolate on his observation of the sincerity of foreign UFO witnesses. </P>
<P>Wrapping up the trilogy discussion, we talk about the third book, <EM><STRONG>Revelations</STRONG></EM>, starting with Vallee’s enlightening observation that UFO sightings and their subsequent impact on our culture is a direct contradiction to the often-cited concept that the UFOs are bound by some kind of non-involvement directive. After that, we talk about his theory, put forth in <EM><STRONG>Revelations</STRONG></EM>, that cattle mutilations may be a “message” of some kind and he makes note of the antithetical fact that there is far more physical evidence left behind by cattle mutilations that UFO reports. </P>
<P>We then discuss the UFO related documents that have been amassed over the last few decades and Vallee explains why he cautions against people putting too much stock into documents that have no source cited. He also talks about the naivete that surrounds FOIA released documents and warns about reading too much into which government departments had possessed such documents. </P>
<P>Heading towards the end, we discuss a very specific gem from Revelations, the Purple Justice case, which was a bizarre abduction in France that Jacques closely investigated. We wrap up the <EM><STRONG>Revelations</STRONG></EM> discussion with Jacques fleshing out his observation, put forth in the book, that many people in Ufology are driven by the need for vindication. First, Jacques explains how that is a natural human emotion, how he feels about that need for vindication for Ufologists, and when that motivation may become dangerous to the serious study of UFOs. </P>
<P>Closing out the show, we find out what’s next for Jacques Vallee, where folks can pick up the Alien Contact trilogy and <EM><STRONG>Messengers of Deception</STRONG></EM>, and how folks can read his books on the history of the Internet. </P>
<P>This interview was recorded on 7.1.2008 </P>
<P>*******************************************<br>www.binnallofamerica.com :: BoA…the esoteric observer.</P>
<P>www.binnallofamericaaudio.com :: BoA:Audio</P>
<P>http://www.myspace.com/binnall :: binnall on myspace</P>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/19/ancient-sites-sacred-landscapes.html"><rss:title>Ancient Sites, Sacred Landscapes</rss:title><rss:link>http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/19/ancient-sites-sacred-landscapes.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Nick Redfern</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-07-19T00:30:37Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/images/1933665327/sr=1-1/qid=1216427583/ref=dp_image_0?ie=UTF8&n=283155&s=books&qid=1216427583&sr=1-1" target="AmazonHelp" onclick="return amz_js_PopWin(this.href,'AmazonHelp','width=700,height=600,resizable=1,scrollbars=1,toolbar=0,status=1');"><img id="prodImage" style="width: 240px; height: 240px" alt="There's Something in the Woods" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51fHS%2BOLf4L._SL500_AA240_.jpg" /></a><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/images/160163000X/sr=1-2/qid=1216427657/ref=dp_image_0?ie=UTF8&n=283155&s=books&qid=1216427657&sr=1-2" target="AmazonHelp" onclick="return amz_js_PopWin(this.href,'AmazonHelp','width=700,height=600,resizable=1,scrollbars=1,toolbar=0,status=1');"></a></p><p>As&nbsp;some of you&nbsp;may be aware, I have made mention in a number of my books of the fact that on numerous occasions strange creatures - such as Bigfoot, black dogs and big cats - have been seen in the vicinity of ancient and sacred sites.<br /><br />Indeed, such stories are a central part of my new book, <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Theres-Something-Woods-Nick-Redfern/dp/1933665327/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1216427583&sr=1-1"><strong><em>There's Something in the Woods</em></strong>.<br /><br /></a>And with that in mind, I'm very pleased to be able to present a guest-blog from Brian Haughton - author of the new book <a href="http://www.amazon.com/Haunted-Spaces-Sacred-Places-Supernatural/dp/160163000X/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1216426611&sr=1-1"><em><strong><u><font style="color: #0066cc" color="#0066cc">Haunted Spaces, Sacred Places: A Field Guide to Stone Circles, Crop Circles, Ancient Tombs, and Supernatural Landscapes</font></u></strong></em></a> - who touches upon the issue of unusual entities seen in such places in the following paper:<br /><br /><strong><em>Ancient Monuments, Sacred Landscapes</em></strong><br />By<br />Brian Haughton<br /><br />By exploring the ancient monuments and sacred landscapes of the world using a combination of archaeology, legend, and folklore, it is possible to obtain a unique insight into the hidden world of our ancestors. But what marked out a place as &ldquo;sacred&rdquo; or &ldquo;special&rdquo; in the mind of ancient man? There may have been a number of factors, varying from culture to culture and over different time periods.<br /><br />One characteristic which must always have been of prime concern when constructing these ancient monuments or ritual complexes was the dividing up of the landscape, the separation of the sacred from the profane. Of course the place may have already possessed natural characteristics that made it unique. Recent research into geological anomalies and acoustics at ancient monuments is coming up with some interesting results. However, it seems more likely that it was something much less tangible, more &ldquo;in the mind&rdquo; of the inhabitants that made the place &ldquo;special.&rdquo;<br /><br />Designing and building structures such as the ritual complex of monuments at Avebury in the UK, the Bighorn Medicine Wheel in Wyoming, USA, and the standing stones at Carnac in northern France may have been a way of &ldquo;monumentalizing&rdquo; or enhancing this aura of sanctity, but it was the place itself that possessed the sacredness. The buildings acted as an expression of this sacredness. Often, nothing at all was constructed at a sacred site, its own personal myth-history being enough for it to be venerated (Ayers Rock in Australia is a good example of this).<br /><br />In any attempt at understanding sacred places, perhaps a good way to begin is by examining some of the legends and lore that have become attached to the sites over time. However, the legends and even the archaeology of ancient sacred places are not sufficient in themselves for an understanding of how our ancestors viewed their sacred landscapes. In the words of American geographer Donald William Meinig &ldquo;any landscape is composed not only of what lies before our eyes but what lies within our heads.&rdquo;<br /><br />To gain even the slightest insight into what was going through the minds of ancient peoples when they designed or visited monuments like the prehistoric temples of Malta or the vast Ohio Serpent Mound, we not only have to reunite ourselves with ancient values and traditions, but also attempt to cut ourselves off from our increasingly materialistic technology-based 21st century worldview.<br /><br />The stories connected with ancient sites can take many forms, from legends at least a thousand years old, such as that of the wizard Merlin transporting the blue stones to Stonehenge, to modern accounts of UFOs and Bigfoot at, for example, Mount Shasta in California. There is a plethora of folklore connected with ancient sacred sites, especially the megalithic monuments of north Western Europe, a number of which are included in my new book, <strong><em>Haunted Spaces, Sacred Spaces</em></strong>.</p><p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/images/160163000X/sr=1-2/qid=1216427657/ref=dp_image_0?ie=UTF8&n=283155&s=books&qid=1216427657&sr=1-2" target="AmazonHelp" onclick="return amz_js_PopWin(this.href,'AmazonHelp','width=700,height=600,resizable=1,scrollbars=1,toolbar=0,status=1');"><img id="prodImage" style="width: 240px; height: 240px" alt="Haunted Spaces, Sacred Places: A Field Guide to Stone Circles, Crop Circles, Ancient Tombs, and Supernatural Landscapes" src="http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/51nYqL12ujL._SL500_AA240_.jpg" /></a></p><p>The folklore of ancient places has become fairly standardized over the years: they are inhabited by fairies, built by giants or the Devil, haunted by ghosts, guarded by dragons, visited by spectral black dogs or cursed by witches. Stones are said to conceal buried treasure, dance at midday, walk down to a stream at midnight to drink, cause people to lose all sense of time and resist all attempts to move or to count them. The parallels between such folklore motifs and modern &ldquo;paranormal&rdquo; accounts reported at ancient monuments are obvious.<br /><br />Indeed, whilst there is a significant record of folklore directly associated with ancient sacred places, the evidence for the occurrence of paranormal phenomena at these sites, reported in many books, Internet sites and magazine articles, is largely unconvincing. Additionally, much of the research into such phenomena is remarkably uncritical, and the conclusions premature to say the least. A good deal of the evidence for supposed &ldquo;window areas,&rdquo; places that apparently attract or produce strange phenomena, is either media generated or consists of exaggerations of local folk tales and legends, as is the case, for example, with a large part of the material related to the San Luis Valley, Colorado, Mount Shasta, California and to a certain extent Mount Penteli, just outside Athens in Greece.<br /><br />However, in all of these areas there are some genuinely baffling elements to a few of the accounts collected, and this criticism does not mean to suggest that unexplained phenomena are never reported at ancient sites. But if the reports of strange lights, crop circles and bizarre creatures at ancient sacred places are indicative of anything, it is that these places are still regarded as significant enough to attract and generate myth and legend thousands of years after their construction. The important question is, whether these myths, ancient and modern, can tell us anything about the beliefs, ideas and motivation of our ancient ancestors. It is in this sense that ancient sacred sites may be viewed as windows into the past.<br /><br />But just how reliable is folklore and myth as a guide to prehistory and history? Can legends shed any light on the construction and purpose of ancient sacred landscapes, such as at that around Stonehenge, and the ritual complex centered on Newgrange in Ireland? The majority of scholars of folklore and myth remain unconvinced that such tales can give us any genuine insights into the mind of ancient man. On many occasions the traditional tales surrounding prehistoric archaeological sites are &ldquo;modern&rdquo; (post 18th century), as with the tale of the Witch at the Rollright Stones in Oxfordshire, UK. If this is the case then it is obvious that although the lore may reflect contemporary ideas about the monuments, which is in itself important, it can tell us nothing relating to the purpose of the site it is connected with.<br /><br />Nevertheless, if research is undertaken combining folklore and legend with archaeology, as it was at Troy by Heinrich Schliemann in the late 19th century, and is currently being done with the archaeology of Stonehenge and the story of Merlin and the blue stones, then perhaps we can begin to create a richer ancient past, one inhabited by people rather than merely their artifacts and buildings. </p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/14/marie-jones-2012-endings-beginnings.html"><rss:title>Marie Jones, 2012, Endings &amp; Beginnings</rss:title><rss:link>http://cultureofcontact.squarespace.com/nick-redferns-on-something/2008/7/14/marie-jones-2012-endings-beginnings.html</rss:link><dc:creator>Nick Redfern</dc:creator><dc:date>2008-07-14T14:57:03Z</dc:date><dc:subject></dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<br>
<P><span class=full-image-inline><span><A href="http://bp3.blogger.com/_pXl03njloLM/SH0OPm924QI/AAAAAAAAAqs/KAl21ZjcYcQ/s1600-h/mariedjones.jpg"><img id=BLOGGER_PHOTO_ID_5223346804140466434 style="FLOAT: left; MARGIN: 0px 10px 10px 0px; WIDTH: 237px; CURSOR: hand; HEIGHT: 320px" alt="" src="http://bp3.blogger.com/_pXl03njloLM/SH0OPm924QI/AAAAAAAAAqs/KAl21ZjcYcQ/s320/mariedjones.jpg"></A></span></span>Over at my Review of the Fortean Kind blog, I recently I reviewed the new book from Marie Jones, <em><A href="http://forteanreviews.blogspot.com/2008/07/2013-beginnings-or-endings.html">2013: The End of Days or a New Beginning?</A></em>&nbsp;Marie has just written a highly illuminating and intriguing essay on the theme of her book, and here it is:<br><br></P>
<DIV><strong></strong></DIV>
<DIV><em><strong>2012: The End Game Begins</strong></em><br>By Marie D. Jones<br><br>The world is abuzz with talk of the year 2012; however, not everyone is looking forward to the year with the same outlook or expectations. For some, the year hints at apocalyptic end times, a period in which the world will be thrown into utter chaos and violent upheaval. A turbulent and tumultuous epoch in which both natural and man-made disasters will decimate and possibly lead to the extinction of life as we know it. </DIV><br>
<DIV>Other, more optimistic people perceive this date as a moment of awakening, a massive global transformation of consciousness…one which is to be anticipated with joy and celebration.<br><br>Perhaps, the real outcome lies somewhere between the two extremes.<br><br>The mythology behind the 2012 enigma focuses on the ancient Mayan Long Count Calendar which was a <span class=blsp-spelling-error id=SPELLING_ERROR_0>Mesoamerican</span> calendar system that mysteriously ends on December 21, 2012. Interestingly enough, that date also coincides with the winter solstice. This date further corresponds with a predicted “galactic alignment” which is believed to occur when our solar system passes directly through the center of the Milky Way galaxy. Although there is some valid argument for other “end dates” as prescribed by the intricate and sophisticated Mayan calendar, including the alternate end date of October 28, 2011 (as well as an end date of December 23, 2012, rather than December 21), most experts who have studied the Long Count agree that time is coming to an end.<br><br>But what kind of an end? In the human mind, the etymology of the word “end” conjures a certain finality – one in which there is no hope.<br><br>Thousands of years before our current civilization, did this seemingly simple agrarian society actually predict that life would end altogether, snuffed out in an explosive supernova of disaster upon plague, warfare upon extermination?<br><br>Both the <span class=blsp-spelling-error id=SPELLING_ERROR_1>Judeo</span>-Christian and Islamic end time scenarios, which are based upon Western fundamentalist <span class=blsp-spelling-error id=SPELLING_ERROR_2>Abrahamic</span> thought, do indeed herald a time of literal cleansing. A time when the earth will suffer through the coming of the Four Horsemen bearing gifts of war, famine, plague and death - with the ultimate judgment day not too far behind. Certainly, there is ample evidence in other religious traditions of an ending of one age, as in the Hindu “<span class=blsp-spelling-error id=SPELLING_ERROR_3>yugas</span>” or ages that mark a cyclical pattern of both external and internal creation and destruction. This ongoing cycle or “<span class=blsp-spelling-error id=SPELLING_ERROR_4>kalpa</span>” also has an end date when, according to Hindu belief, the final avatar will incarnate as Kali and bring about the destruction of all wicked people. Is that likewise an “end?”<br><br>Even the oldest creation stories and mythologies tell of a cosmic cycle punctuated by a Big Ending, so to speak, although many native traditions believe that the end, though violent and deadly to be sure, would then be the beginning of a new era of peace, harmony and enlightenment.<br><br>The Mayans themselves have suggested that their own end date is really nothing more than the finishing point of a particular age or “underworld,” the one we are living in right now, the Galactic Underworld, and the entry point into the Universal Underworld of both conscious evolution and revolution. There is nothing in Mayan tradition, lore or belief that envisages a scenario in which we will all die and the planet will cease to exist. Rather, the idea is one of amazing and collective rebirth. A period of <span class=blsp-spelling-error id=SPELLING_ERROR_5>newfound</span> cosmic awareness, an era in which humanity expands their collective conscious awareness.<br></DIV>
<DIV>Then why all the angst and fear when people speak of 2012? Maybe, the answer is within us. Perhaps it is as simple as basic human psychology. Nobody likes change, especially when it is preceded by great stress, trials, tribulations, and challenges, the likes of which we are already seeing in the years leading up to 2012.<br><br>Even if we were to ignore completely the Mayan Long Count Calendar and its Aztec sister version (which speaks of the very same end time transformation) and even if we did not ascribe to the religious traditions that await total human annihilation at the hands of a final battle between the devil and the Christ (don’t worry, the good guys will be <span class=blsp-spelling-error id=SPELLING_ERROR_6>raptured</span>, we are told!), there is still ample evidence that the next few years will be rife with chaos, disorder and destruction. Why? Because what we resist persists and often grows, and if there is indeed a wave of spiritual transformation gaining momentum, then coming resistance will be more than enough to make us wonder if we will, indeed, wake up to a brave new world on the first morning of 2013.</DIV>
<DIV><br>As we have seen over the last several years, global power is shifting to the East, with economic turmoil already gripping much of the West in a headlock of plunging home values, rising energy costs, shaky markets, and a widening gap between the rich and the poor. As we approach (if we have not already) peak oil, the quest for easily extracted fuel will exponentially increase&shy;&shy;‑-&shy;even as the population skyrockets in urbanized areas as well as in nations such as China and India which will only serve to further demand while supplies continue dwindling to depletion. Access to potable water threatens to plunge the entire globe into new wars, even as corporations scramble to privatize what little natural resources remain.<br><br>Global climate change is destroying indigenous and island lifestyles, and creating chaos all over the world as more nations are forced to deal with brutal drought, while others battle unprecedented flooding. Warm places are getting warmer, Arctic Ice is melting, and the unfortunate people of Tuvalu are watching as their entire island sinks mercilessly into rising ocean waters.<br><br>Malaria, a humid-weather disease, is moving into highlands where it never existed before while other diseases threaten to derail any attempts by our most cutting edge pharmaceuticals to fight them. West Nile Virus, <span class=blsp-spelling-error id=SPELLING_ERROR_7>SARS</span>, <span class=blsp-spelling-error id=SPELLING_ERROR_8>MRSA</span> and avian flu all seem poised to pounce upon nations of people unprepared for pandemics, let alone regional epidemics. And lest you think our public health and emergency preparedness systems will save us, let me remind you of the horrendous failings apparent during Hurricane Katrina.<br><br>But don’t despair! The news is not all awful. Science, medicine and technology promise to explode into the stratosphere in the coming years. Computer technology historically follows an established pattern known as “Moore’s Law” which describes an important trend in the history of computer hardware whereby the number of transistors that can be inexpensively placed on an integrated circuits increase exponentially, doubling approximately every two years. Some technologists believe that this increase is steadfastly moving towards a “singularity,” when growth, development and transformation will come together in a climactic head, ushering in a brave new world of artificial intelligence. Before we know it, life itself will seem to be a sci-<span class=blsp-spelling-error id=SPELLING_ERROR_9>fi</span> movie!<br><br>Quantum computers, bioengineering, human longevity experiments, and nanotechnology stand at the forefront of major advances in the way we live, and even die. With astonishing new genetic research, we may one day see the end of all disease. With the promising new exploration of bionics, we may never need worry about heart or liver failure again, knowing that we can order a new one that combines the best of both computer technology and biology - creating new types of living systems that promise to change not only our quality of life…but our whole culture itself.<br><br>Naturally, some may fear the rise of artificial intelligence and the coming singularity due to the (perhaps warranted) concern that humans will be somehow made obsolete – or worse, that we may lose control to the very machinery that we created…machinery that can think faster and more efficiently than we do. Others still wait excitedly for the development of technologies which will make life easier than ever. However, even the promise of an easier life comes with a price. Rising rates of heart disease, cancer and obesity are directly linked with the increasingly sedentary lifestyles of most developed nations. Add to that existing rates of disease in undeveloped nations, and emerging diseases entering and re-entering the fray, and humanity may not be wiped out at all by a big, bold natural disaster or nuclear war.<br><br>Alarmingly enough, we may get snuffed out by the tiniest of threats, those packing the biggest punch of all – viruses that invade our bodies. Viruses pose a very real, very significant threat to humankind as our bodies are too weak and stressed to fight back, with pharmaceuticals rendered ineffective from years of overuse.<br><br>Surprisingly, the greatest challenges that face humanity and the earth in general, over the next few years are all preventable. With that being said, the biggest mystery is why we are not doing more to prevent them now…while we still can…and when it truly counts. Global climate change is creating a need for new ways of co-existing with the earth. Already, water shortages are threatening to derail peace agreements and further escalate already tense relations between nations into the stratosphere of war. Even the decreasing rates of food production, coupled with over inflated prices and a global market that favors the rich, hint at another coming disaster; the spread of famine into regions never having experienced lack of food before.<br><br>So what can we do as individuals, communities, and nations? How does one prepare for 2012? If the world is going to end for good, then obviously no preparation is needed. However, if the Mayans and others were right, and the ending is really more of a beginning, can we indeed prepare at all?<br><br>The green movement, focusing on building sustainability now, is a great place to start. We should be doing anything possible to make the coming changes less disruptive and damaging, whether that means conserving, recycling or raising awareness of the carbon “footprints” we each leave…and how we can lessen those footprints. Local communities are already springing up around the concept of contained, sustainable living, with residents pitching in by growing food, sharing water resources, bartering services and even watching out for each other’s children to create a new sense of connectedness and unity. Should this effort spread, we may be able to greatly diminish the potential for death, disaster and disease that our overpopulated, stressed out and soon-to-be tapped out planet is quickly plummeting towards.<br><br>Ultimately, the year 2012 may be more about internal transformation rather than external change. Even with increasing numbers of super storms and earthquakes, an asteroid or two coming too close for comfort, the highest sunspot cycle activity in years, global shifts in political and economic power, and a host of other earthbound changes, we may need to concentrate on the internal work to be done first. Spiritual transformation is on the lips of many awaiting 2012. Perhaps by altering our collective consciousness we can change not only our own lives, but our destiny as a people. <span class=blsp-spelling-error id=SPELLING_ERROR_10>Wouldn</span>’t it be great to wake up on the first morning of 2013 to a better world than we ever imagined?<br><br>The problem is that before we can realize it…we must first have both the insight and the foresight to imagine it.</DIV>]]></content:encoded></rss:item></rdf:RDF>